reposting from 2011 ..keeping Toback alive.
I could not tell you how often one gets inspired by watching an episode of Intervention. Regardless, I recently had this happen to me. The episode seemed like 2 to 3
chapters out of an awesome Vollmann I'd only half read, losing track of it three months ago. And both the television show and the
book were now causing me to make further connections with 2 of my most
recent movie revisitations.
The episode was titled " Latisha
', and getting inside her world for 60 minutes broke my heart. Her
crack addiction kept her worldview obscured by a cheery veil, elevating
her self image to 'Queen of the streets' in the fabulous ghetto of her
diseased existence. The episode broke the mold of A + E 'reality'
drama. The producers and director actually filmed with two lenses; one
a lens of clarity, the moments of intoxication and cocaine psychosis
embarrassingly clear. The second lens used was that of Latisha's own
self protective or rather self projective denial. A sort of denial that
is, mostly by the nature of both the disease of addiction and the
nature of crack cocaine, narcissisticly destructive; self perpetuating
by delusions of self importance.
This projection colored my sense
of Latisha's experience of her world. It allowed me the escapism of
her highly stimulated thought process and the momentary joy of her
imaginary relationships.
I'd recently been chipping away at William T. Vollmann's :" The Royal Family",
a sprawling dissection of genealogy and stratum of San Francisco pimps ,
whores, and the Unicorn of this particular zoo, the elusive "Queen of
the Whores", aka "Africa."
Vollmann's male protag is haunted and
degenerate. He is a noirish detective by way of a Proustian sad sack,
dropped into a transgressive, insular world of fucked up folk. He is
one half romantically haunted by a dead lover and one half digging
progressively deeper into the mud of the royal whoredom; eventually
projecting his obsessions on a whore who Judy Bartons herself into his
deceased love.
How did anything strike beyond the obvious remembrance of the cool novel I'd failed in finishing?
What
this television episode and this post modern novel share is a quality
that also appears in films, though usually sweatier and involving
pacing or the cover up of something like a heist or a murder.
This
distorted self projection and fucked up self will is something of a
germ. Infecting the host it leads to secondary diseases, such as
compulsive behavior and addiction, be it gambling, alcohol, drugs, what
have you. In films, lucky for us, it also results in projecting a world
of their own diseased thinking's creation, one that is entertaining
while illuminating, as well as insane, colorful and full of constant
heart pounding danger.
I'm thinking of the sweat on Nomi Malone's face in SHOWGIRLS.
She is three different things and they are also one and the same:
victim or pursuant of Capitalism, a dancer who is a wannabee star, and
an Addict. Not a surprise when in the film's fourth quarter she is
revealed as an ex junkie, and we see her come alive when she does blow.
Her
sweaty forehead and bugged out 'star' eyes are demonic and bothered, a
distinct image yet mere mutation on the aloof vacancy in James Caan's
eyes in THE GAMBLER. Any interiority ironically revealed through voiceover and the occasional sound bridge.
Both
figures drawn here are playing the losing card. How can Nomi ever gain
status and respect without stealing them? And how can a human being, as
Ivy League as he may be, ever beat the Numbers?
In a classroom
scene, Caan's collegiate professor speaks in a Psych or Philosophy class
about intangibles such as Desire and Will. Things that , for Caan's
alter ego of nighttime degenerate gambler find reflected only the
simplest materialist games. The only expressions of emotive power and
psychology in the film are those of people in Caan's world..those
gangsters affected by the hustler's life and the family members
distraught by Caan's risk and loss. Caan, meanwhile, remains a blank
mirrored screen, and antithetical to a Nomi Malone, his own wild inner
process is laid bare only by the measure of how others respond to his
madness.
The film illuminates his disease by showing him as
leading almost two entirely different lives. His battle is built around
shame and a destructive belief of self grandeur, each fueling the
other.
These filmed losers are lovers and their hatred of self and
desperation to be loved is made visible in neon gemmed manicures,
headdresses, coke nails, maternal robberies, and Atlantic City betting
benders.
No comments:
Post a Comment